By 
Vaginal rejuvenation is a term used to describe a range of procedures performed by gynecologists or plastic surgeons to enhance sexual functioning and improve the appearance of the vagina. These procedures, which can include vaginoplasty, vaginal tightening, and perineum rejuvenation, are often marketed as a means to address issues such as vaginal laxity, which can result from childbirth, aging, or atrophy.
Controversy and Criticism
The practice of vaginal rejuvenation has been met with criticism and controversy due to concerns about its effectiveness, safety, and the potential for over-medicalization of sexuality. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) have called for standardized nomenclature and the elimination of non-medical terms associated with these procedures.
Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
Traditional surgical techniques for vaginal rejuvenation involve excision of redundant vaginal tissues, muscular tightening, and remodeling of the perineal body. A study reported that after 12 months, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) total score significantly improved, particularly in the orgasm domain, and 92.8% of women were satisfied with the outcomes. However, common complications included implant exposure, capsule contracture, and infection.
Laser-Based Treatments
The use of lasers for vaginal rejuvenation has been a subject of debate. The FDA has not cleared these devices for this purpose, and there is concern about their safety and efficacy. Adverse events associated with laser-based treatments include chronic bladder pain, burning sensations on the vulva, and scarring that causes the vaginal walls to cohere. Despite warnings from the FDA, claims and advertisements for laser-based vaginal rejuvenation persist.
Nonsurgical Methods
Nonsurgical methods for vaginal rejuvenation, such as radiofrequency (RF) treatments, have been developed. These treatments aim to create neocollagenesis and neoelastogenesis in the vaginal submucosa, which may contribute to treating vaginal laxity. However, the effectiveness and safety of these methods are still under scrutiny, with some studies suggesting no benefit over sham therapy.
Conclusion
Vaginal rejuvenation is a complex and evolving field, with a range of surgical and nonsurgical techniques being proposed. While some women report satisfaction with the outcomes, the safety and efficacy of these procedures remain a subject of debate, with concerns about over-medicalization and the potential for adverse effects. The FDA has not cleared many of these devices for vaginal rejuvenation, and the medical community continues to call for more rigorous testing and regulation in this area.
Comments